How do couples meet now? What the data says about love, apps and the friend who set you up
In America the internet overtook friends as Cupid's favourite intermediary years ago. In Britain the office and the friendship group are still holding their ground.
How heterosexual US couples who met in 2017 got together (% of couples; categories overlap)
In 1995, according to Stanford’s long-running survey of American couples, one in three heterosexual couples met through friends and just 2 per cent met online. By 2017 the internet had reached 39 per cent and friends had slipped to 20. Somewhere in those two decades the matchmaking job your mate used to do at a dinner party was quietly handed to a server farm.
That is the American story, and it is the one most often quoted. Britain’s numbers tell a slower, more sociable tale, where colleagues and friendship groups still introduce more couples than any app. Here is what the best available research says about how couples meet, where the figures come from, and what they cannot tell you.
The Stanford study: how American couples meet
The most cited source on the subject is How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST), a nationally representative survey run by the Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld. Its 2017 wave questioned 3,510 American adults through Ipsos’s probability-based KnowledgePanel, according to Rosenfeld’s 2025 paper on the survey’s later waves.
The headline analysis came in August 2019, when Rosenfeld, Reuben Thomas and Sonia Hausen published “Disintermediating your friends” in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Comparing heterosexual couples who met in 1995 with those who met in 2017, they found:
- Online: 2 per cent in 1995, 39 per cent in 2017
- Bar or restaurant: 19 per cent to 27 per cent
- Through friends: 33 per cent to 20 per cent
- Co-workers: 19 per cent to 11 per cent
- Family: 15 per cent to 7 per cent
- School: 10 per cent to 5 per cent
- Church: 7 per cent to 4 per cent
- Neighbours: 8 per cent to 3 per cent
Categories overlap (a couple who matched online and first met in a bar counts twice), so the columns do not add to 100. The trend, though, is hard to argue with. Every traditional intermediary lost ground except the bar, which rose partly because so many online matches have their first meeting over a drink.
Stanford’s own summary of the research puts the 2009 figure at 22 per cent, so the online share nearly doubled in eight years, the period in which dating moved from the desktop to the smartphone. “Meeting a significant other online has replaced meeting through friends,” Rosenfeld said at the time.
Strangers, not friends of friends
The subtler finding concerns who does the introducing. Among couples who met online, the share who met through a third person fell from 11.2 per cent in 2009 to 3.7 per cent in 2017, while the share who were complete strangers beforehand rose from 81 per cent to 89.5 per cent. Friends once vetted potential partners. Now, for most online couples, nobody does.
Same-sex couples moved online first
The shift is starker still for gay and lesbian couples. The PNAS paper reports that about 65 per cent of same-sex couples who met in 2017 did so online. Rosenfeld’s separate chapter on Tinder and dating apps, also drawing on the 2017 survey, found that apps arranged 85 per cent of the dates that single gay men had been on in the previous year, against 8 per cent of the women met by single heterosexual men. His conclusion was that phone apps had made “only a very modest impact” on most Americans’ romantic lives, with gay men the clear exception.
Does how you met predict how long you last?
Not much, on the evidence so far. The PNAS authors found no significant effect of meeting method on break-up once the decade of meeting was taken into account. The one difference: heterosexual couples who met online moved into marriage faster. A University of Geneva study of Swiss couples, covered below, reached a similar verdict on relationship satisfaction.
What Pew found: online dating’s reach in the US
Stanford measures couples. The Pew Research Center’s online dating survey, fielded on 6,034 American adults in July 2022 and published in February 2023, measures people, and its numbers are lower.
Pew found that 10 per cent of partnered adults met their current partner on a dating site or app. That doubles to 20 per cent of partnered adults under 30, and reaches 24 per cent of partnered lesbian, gay and bisexual adults. Three in ten American adults (30 per cent) have ever used a dating site or app, the same share as in 2019, rising to 53 per cent of under-30s.
Why does Pew’s 10 per cent sit so far below Stanford’s 39? They are asking different questions. Pew’s figure covers everyone with a partner today, including couples who got together in the 1970s; Stanford’s 39 per cent is the share of couples formed in a single recent year. Both are correct, and the gap between them is itself a measure of how quickly things changed.
Users are not uniformly charmed. Pew found 53 per cent of online daters described their experience as positive and 46 per cent as negative, and 42 per cent of those asked said online dating had made finding a long-term partner easier, against 22 per cent who said harder. We look at the darker side of those numbers in our piece on dating app fatigue.
How British couples meet: work, friends and the night out
For the UK, the freshest figures come from YouGov’s Big Survey on Relationships, which polled 1,882 British adults on 9 and 10 July 2026 and was published on 17 August. Asked how they met their current or most recent partner, Britons answered:
- At work: 19 per cent
- Through friends: 18 per cent
- Out and about, by chance: 14 per cent
- On a dating app: 11 per cent
- At school: 6 per cent
- At university: 6 per cent
- Through older-style online dating sites: 5 per cent
- Through a shared hobby: 5 per cent
- Through family: 3 per cent
YouGov’s detailed breakdown shows how sharply this varies with age. Dating apps account for 16 per cent of relationships among 18 to 29-year-olds and 22 per cent among people in their thirties, but just 3 per cent among the over-60s. Chance meetings run the other way: 20 per cent of over-60s met their partner while out and about, against 5 or 6 per cent of people in their twenties and thirties.
Add apps and older dating websites together and roughly one in six British relationships began online. That is well below the American figure for recent couples, though the comparison is imperfect: YouGov asks about all current and recent partners, not couples formed in a single year.
The 2020 snapshot
An earlier YouGov analysis from February 2020 found the same broad pattern, with work and mutual friends on top. Among 25 to 34-year-olds, over a fifth had met online, 13 per cent through apps and 9 per cent through websites such as OkCupid or Guardian Soulmates. Among 45 to 54-year-olds, work (22 per cent) and chance encounters (19 per cent) still led.
Northern Ireland: friends and pubs still win
The Northern Ireland Life and Times survey for 2023, run by ARK, asked married and cohabiting respondents how they first met their partner. Friends led on 23 per cent, followed by a pub or restaurant on 17 per cent and the workplace on 15 per cent. Online came in at 9 per cent overall, but at 16 per cent among 25 to 34-year-olds, against 3 per cent of over-65s.
How many Britons are on the apps?
Ofcom tracks usage rather than couples. Its 2024 Online Nation figures, drawn on for a Valentine’s Day release in February 2025, found that one in ten UK adults (4.9 million) used an online dating service, with Tinder reaching 1.9 million adults and Hinge 1.4 million in May 2024. Tinder had lost 600,000 UK users over the year, and one in five 18 to 24-year-olds used a dating service, the highest of any age group. For the fuller picture on reach and revenue, see our online dating statistics.
How couples meet in Europe
Comparable national data elsewhere is patchier, and often older.
Switzerland. A study by Gina Potarca of the University of Geneva, published in PLOS ONE and announced by the university in December 2020, used the Swiss Federal Statistical Office’s 2018 family survey: 3,235 adults who had met their partner within the previous decade. Couples who met through apps reported stronger intentions to live together than couples who met offline, women in app-formed couples were more likely to want a child soon, and relationship satisfaction was the same however people had met. Apps also mixed education levels and geography more than offline meeting did.
The Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) reported in 2014 that more than 13 per cent of couples who had moved in together in the previous five years met online, according to DutchNews, with the share far higher among older people: 37 per cent of over-55s who found a new partner met them online. Leisure settings such as clubs and holidays remained the most common route.
Across Europe. Researchers at the University of Southampton are now using the Generations and Gender Surveys, fielded in 14 European countries between 2020 and 2023, to compare partnerships that began online with those that began offline, according to their 2025 conference abstract. Expect that work to become the European benchmark once the full results are published.
After the pandemic: fewer new couples, full stop
How people meet is only half the question; how many meet at all is the other. In a paper for the Journal of Family Issues, summarised by Stanford’s sociology department, Rosenfeld found that the share of American adults who were single rose from 18.9 per cent in 2017 to 24.3 per cent in 2022, more than 10 million extra single adults even after adjusting for age. He calls it a “pandemic dating recession”.
The working paper behind it adds that the share of adults aged 23 and over who had formed a relationship in the previous 12 months fell from 5.5 per cent in 2017 to 3.2 per cent in 2022. Singleness rose most among adults aged 35 and under. The later survey waves are much smaller than the 2017 sample, which is one reason a fresh how-couples-met breakdown for the 2020s has yet to replace the 2017 figures.
What the numbers add up to
Put the studies side by side and three patterns hold. Online meeting dominates new relationships in the United States, especially for same-sex couples and people under 40. In Britain, work and friends still edge it overall, though apps already lead among people in their thirties. And everywhere, the older the couple, the more likely their story begins with a colleague, a friend or a chance encounter.
The other constant is that the method matters less than people fear. The best evidence, from Stanford and Geneva alike, finds couples who met online are no less happy and no more likely to split. If you are weighing which app to try, our ranking of the best dating apps and our Hinge review are good places to start.
Frequently asked questions
How do most couples meet today?
In the United States, online. Stanford’s survey found 39 per cent of heterosexual couples who met in 2017 met online, more than any other route. In Britain, YouGov’s 2026 survey found work (19 per cent) and friends (18 per cent) narrowly ahead of dating apps (11 per cent).
What percentage of couples meet on dating apps in the UK?
YouGov found that 11 per cent of Britons met their current or most recent partner on a dating app, plus 5 per cent through older dating websites. Among people in their thirties the app figure is 22 per cent.
Are couples who meet online less likely to last?
The research says no. The 2019 PNAS study found no significant difference in break-up rates once the decade of meeting was accounted for, and heterosexual couples who met online married faster. A 2020 Swiss study found no difference in relationship satisfaction.
Do people still meet through friends?
Yes, though less than they did. Stanford’s data shows meeting through friends falling from 33 per cent of US couples in 1995 to 20 per cent in 2017. In the UK, friends remain one of the two most common routes, at 18 per cent in YouGov’s 2026 survey and 23 per cent in Northern Ireland’s 2023 Life and Times survey.
Why do different studies give such different figures?
They measure different things. Stanford’s 39 per cent counts couples who met in a single year; Pew’s 10 per cent covers all partnered adults, including long-married couples. YouGov asks about current or most recent partners. Read the question before you compare the answers.
Sources
- Rosenfeld, Thomas and Hausen, “Disintermediating your friends”, PNAS, 2019 (author’s PDF)
- Stanford News report on the PNAS study, August 2019
- Rosenfeld, “Are Tinder and dating apps changing dating and mating in the U.S.?”
- Rosenfeld, “Singleness and the pandemic dating recession”, working paper, January 2025
- Stanford Department of Sociology summary of the pandemic dating recession paper
- Pew Research Center, “Key findings about online dating in the U.S.”, February 2023
- YouGov, The YouGov Big Survey on Relationships, August 2026
- YouGov, Big Survey on Relationships, section 1: how Britons met, August 2026
- YouGov, “How do Brits find love?”, February 2020
- ARK, Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey 2023, MEETPART
- Ofcom, top online dating trends revealed, February 2025
- University of Geneva, “Couple life: dating apps don’t destroy love”, December 2020
- DutchNews, “Internet dating takes off, 13% of Dutch live-in couples meet online”, June 2014
- Kuang, Perelli-Harris and Berrington, “How we met”, IPC 2025 abstract


